Research_strapline

Are you an:

Don't let the labels put you off!
If you're not an investor, but you want to learn, you can select investor

×

Register for FundCalibre!

We just need to know
if you are an:

Don't let the labels put you off!
If you're not an investor, but you want to learn, you can select investor

×

10 July 2017

Daring to be different

By Smith & Williamson Enterprise co-manager Mark Boucher

We talk about correlation a lot when it comes to investing, particularly when we are worried about markets. It's part of the 'diversification' argument - being careful not to put all your investment eggs in one basket, in the hope that if one investment falls in value, another either won't fall as far, or will even see a gain.

Correlation explained

Calculating correlation can get a bit complicated, but simply put, if the calculation throws up a number close to 1 there is a 'perfect positive correlation', which means the assets or funds are likely to move in exactly the same direction. If the number is close to -1, there is a 'perfect negative correlation' and the assets or funds will move in the exactly the opposite direction. A number close to zero means there is no correlation – or relationship – at all.

Read more: You're not as diversified as you think

One fund that exhibits this close to zero correlation to its benchmark is Smith & Williamson Enterprise. It is a targeted absolute return fund that invests in UK equities and can make money by going 'long' (investing in companies it thinks are good and will do well), or also going 'short' (trying to make money when stock prices fall). Its correlation to the FTSE All Share index is 0.11¹ and this is one of the reasons we like this fund for diversification and to dampen volatility in a portfolio.

The long and short of it

The name of the game for the managers of this fund is capital protection. We caught up with Mark Boucher, one of the co-managers, to get an update on how they are positioning the fund in the current environment:

“Post-Brexit we have really focused on companies, as it is very hard to call macroeconomic and currency movements. But the past six months have come with an enormous amount of stock dispersion, which is good. It means we can really sift the wheat from the chaff and make money from both.

“A company we haven't liked and have shorted in the past year is Pearson, which in our view has structural problems. It is a dollar earner so it benefited from sterling falling after the EU referendum, but since then it has had no fewer than four profit warnings and the share price has collapsed. People just don't want to pay huge amounts for text books any more, and it has been slow to evolve to meet the changing environment.

“An example of a company we like and have invested in is Melrose. It has a very strong management team with a track record of buying, fixing and selling on the companies that they manage. This is not an oil price call or US macroeconomic improvement call, just a confidence in very good people.

“Overall the portfolio currently consists of 46 longs and 31 shorts². Shorts are more risky and hence we have fewer of them. We like to take things slow and steady and not take gambles. There is no point putting everything on black!”

Where to next?

¹Source: Smith & Williamson for the period 3 April 2006 to 31 May 2017 ²Source: Smith & Williamson as at 31 st May 2017

Past performance is not a reliable guide to future returns. You may not get back the amount originally invested, and tax rules can change over time. Mark's views are his own and do not constitute financial advice.