Helicopter money explained

Sarah Culver 26/05/2017 in Basics

Having finally got our heads around the term ‘quantitative easing’, ‘helicopter money’ is now being bandied around as the next unconventional method from the central banks to try to kickstart the global economy.

At the moment, the world continues to flirt with deflation. During deflationary periods, when the costs of things go down instead of up, people and companies hoard money instead of spending it. Why pay £100 for something today, when it will cost £95 next month? Lower demand for goods and services leads to further price cuts and businesses going bust. It’s a downward spiral and one central bankers want to avoid at all costs.

In simple terms, helicopter money is a more direct way of getting people to spend money. It’s not a new idea. David Hume, an 18th century philosopher, asked what would happen if some good fairy went around doubling the money in everybody’s pockets. In 1969, Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman merely replaced the fairy with a helicopter.

In a recent update, Ian Spreadbury, manager of the Elite Rated Fidelity Strategic Bond fund, said: “As unbelievable as it seems, respected economists are now beginning to discuss helicopter money as a viable strategy to boost economic growth. Although we are far away from it in the US, UK and most other parts of the world, Japan could be a test case for helicopter money in the future after 20 years of zero nominal growth.”

He said that helicopter money could take the form of a central bank printing money to fund tax cuts, or giving it to governments to spend on building infrastructure. It could also be given directly to the private sector.

So helicopter money is a literal windfall to be used to help the economy grow. It may be nice for a shopping spree, but the hyperinflation that could ensue may not be so pleasant.

Ian continued: “History has shown us that this type of policy has been difficult to implement. When it has been used in the past in Zimbabwe, Hungary and Germany, it has been associated with hyperinflation, and this is one reason why central bankers are unwilling to discuss the idea of helicopter money openly.

“If it were introduced, such a policy would have to be carefully managed by an independent central bank with targets around growth and inflation. This would ensure that if additional money printing started to push up inflation expectations, policymakers could clamp down quickly. Because of these risks, I would view this type of policy with extreme caution.”

This article is provided for information only. The views of the author and any people quoted are their own and do not constitute financial advice. The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any fund or trust, or to adopt a particular investment strategy. However, the knowledge that professional analysts have analysed a fund or trust in depth before assigning them a rating can be a valuable additional filter for anyone looking to make their own decisions.Past performance is not a reliable guide to future returns. Market and exchange-rate movements may cause the value of investments to go down as well as up. Yields will fluctuate and so income from investments is variable and not guaranteed. You may not get back the amount originally invested. Tax treatment depends of your individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future. If you are unsure about the suitability of any investment you should seek professional advice.Whilst FundCalibre provides product information, guidance and fund research we cannot know which of these products or funds, if any, are suitable for your particular circumstances and must leave that judgement to you. Before you make any investment decision, make sure you’re comfortable and fully understand the risks. Further information can be found on Elite Rated funds by simply clicking on the name highlighted in the article.