Should I spend or should I save?
With our social lives on hold, holidays postponed, and many shops shut, there hasn’t been much to do...
Jupiter UK Smaller Companies
Jupiter UK Smaller Companies fund offers investors access to a broad range of themes across the spectrum of the UK's smallest companies, from retailers to manufacturing exporters, from high-tech growth companies to established mainstream brands. Manager Dan Nickols is seen as a very safe pair of hands, consistently outperforming rivals over the past decade and longer.
Previously Merian UK Smaller Companies
Company description
Founded in 1985, Jupiter Asset Management has grown from a specialist investment boutique to a global fund management company. It provides a range of products from bond and equity funds to multi-asset strategies for both retail and institutional clients. Jupiter is a strong proponent of active management and therefore gives its managers the freedom to run their funds their way, without having to adhere to a 'house' view. In July 2020, Jupiter completed its acquisition of Merian Global Investors.
Fund manager
Dan Nickols has managed this strategy in its various guises since January 2004. Previous employment included stints at Deloitte and Touche, at Morgan Stanley in the European equities division and at Albert E Sharp as a fund manager. His investment career started in 1994. He has a degree in Modern and Medieval Languages from Cambridge University.
Investment process
Dan employs a flexible style to manage the Jupiter UK Smaller Companies fund and will pick stocks he believes to be the best opportunities, rather than deciding on holdings through any particular style lens. To find these ideas, Dan uses a mixture of bottom-up analysis - looking at company fundamentals - and top down analysis, where he will look at the bigger economic picture to understand the drivers behind markets and companies.
To assist with stock analysis, all portfolio managers on the desk are considered analysts, and they have certain sectors they are responsible for researching. The team has worked together for a long period and has a certain set of criteria to look for.
This work covers an assessment of a company’s market position, strengths and weaknesses, economic sensitivity, financial stability, management quality, long- term growth prospects, and valuation. All of these factors are discussed in a weekly team meeting. The ideas are debated and challenged, and the team may decide that further analysis is required.
Finally, meetings with company management are an important part of the process. The team typically conducts over 300 meetings a year.
The top-down work is aimed at identifying the sectors that are likely to do better than the overall economy. The team studies a range of factors such as GDP growth, inflation and interest rates, plus significant events, trends and themes. This helps it identify what areas it wishes to be in and how to tilt the profile of the portfolio.
Stocks will need to be in the Numis Smaller Companies index at the point of initial purchase, but Dan can continue to hold them as they grow, including allowing up to 20% of the fund to be outside of this index. Individual positions will be between 0.5-3% on initial investment but will not exceed 5%. Dan can also hold up to 10% of the fund in non-listed companies. However, he will need permission to invest above a 6% weight in total.
Risk
With stock selection being the primary driver behind the construction of the Jupiter UK Smaller Companies fund and the portfolio being quite concentrated, the key risks are in the performance of the individual names. However, the rigorous investment process is designed to identify the risks to the company. As the fund is invested in smaller companies, there is some liquidity risk, especially around extreme stock movements. This is monitored by an independent risk team, though Dan is ultimately responsible, with this factored into the stock analysis work and the portfolio positioned accordingly.
The information, data, analyses, and opinions contained herein (1) include the proprietary information of FundCalibre, (2) may not be copied or redistributed without prior permission, (3) do not constitute investment advice offered by FundCalibre, (4) are provided solely for informational purposes and therefore are not an offer to buy or sell a fund, and (5) are not warranted to be correct, complete, or accurate. FundCalibre shall not be responsible for any trading decisions, damages, or other losses resulting from, or related to, this information, data, analyses, or opinions or their use. The Elite Fund rating is subjective in nature and reflects FundCalibre’s current expectations of future events/behaviour as they relate to a particular fund. Because such events/behaviour may turn out to be different than expected, FundCalibre does not guarantee that a fund will perform in line with its FundCalibre benchmark. Likewise, the Elite Fund rating should not be seen as any sort of guarantee or assessment of the creditworthiness of a fund nor of its underlying securities and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. FundCalibre disclaims any responsibility for trading decisions, damages or other losses resulting from any use of the Elite Fund rating. All performance data, as well as fund size, OCF, AMC, annual income (historic), share price discount or premium, is sourced directly from FE Analytics, and will change periodically.