Why rising bond yields could spell trouble for stock markets
By James Yardley on 8 September 2026 in Fixed income
Good economic news would normally be expected to give stock markets a boost. Yet when the US reported bumper jobs figures last week, shares fell.
Why? Because investors are increasingly worried that a strong economy, combined with stubborn inflation, could keep interest rates higher for longer or even force central banks to raise them again. And those fears are showing up most clearly in the bond market.
This matters even if you never intend to own a government bond. Rising bond yields can eventually mean higher borrowing costs for governments, businesses and households. Mortgages and business loans become more expensive, companies have less money to invest and consumers have less money to spend.
And that can become a problem for stock markets.
First, what exactly is happening to bonds?
Governments regularly borrow money by issuing bonds. Investors effectively lend money to the government and receive interest in return.
When investors become more nervous about lending, perhaps because they are worried about inflation or whether governments are borrowing too much, they may demand a higher return for taking that risk. That pushes bond yields higher.
We are seeing that happen across the world.
In the US, the yield on 30-year government bonds has risen from 4.6% in late February to as high as 5.3% in recent weeks, while the 2-year yield has climbed from 3.4% to more than 4.4%*.
But this isn’t just an American problem. Longer-term government borrowing costs have also been rising in the UK, Japan and France. Across the G7 group of developed economies, average government bond yields have reached their highest level since 2000.
There are two big reasons investors are demanding more.
Problem one: inflation isn’t going away easily
Inflation has been above the Federal Reserve target of 2% since February 2021. More recently, higher energy prices have added another complication. But oil isn’t the only issue.
Alec Cutler, manager of the Orbis Global Cautious fund, says: “We see inflationary pressures building on both the supply and demand sides of the global economy.
“On the supply side, the consequences of protectionist policies such as tariffs, re-industrialisation and the Iran War are contributing to higher input costs and overall prices.
“On the demand side, the substantial AI capital spending is also contributing to inflationary pressures. We expect these dynamics will keep inflation and bond yields elevated.”
Problem two: governments have borrowed a lot of money
The other concern is simply the sheer amount governments need to borrow. Government debt has risen significantly across many developed economies. The more debt governments issue, the more they need investors to keep buying it. But investors don’t have to accept whatever return is offered.
Gareth Gettinby, from the fixed income team at Aegon Asset Management, which runs the Aegon Strategic Bond fund, points to the phenomenon of fiscal dominance, whereby central banks struggle to tackle inflation because of government debt burdens: “In a world of ever-higher debt burdens, governments are becoming increasingly sensitive to borrowing costs, limiting how far central banks can tighten policy without creating wider strains for public finances.”
This creates an uncomfortable problem. Governments need to borrow, but investors may demand higher yields to lend to heavily indebted countries. Those higher yields then make the government’s existing debt burden even more expensive to manage. And because many major economies face the same problem, there may not be a simple solution.
Why can’t governments just push yields back down?
The US has already tried to calm its bond market. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced an expansion of government purchases of longer-term US bonds in August, officially to improve the functioning of the market. Initially, yields fell. But the effect didn’t last.
Alistair Irvine, manager of the Jupiter Merlin Balance Portfolio, said it wasn’t surprising that one sceptical Wall Street commentator described it as “financial hocus pocus”. “Markets were unimpressed and within 24 hours of the order, two thirds of the positive reaction in running yields had been lost. Trump and his Treasury Secretary are wasting their time and taxpayers’ dollars again.”
Could this be solved with some warm words on fiscal responsibility and token spending cuts? Or perhaps some resolution to the war in Iran? This would help, but there are two key problems.
The first is that the problem is global. There is too much government debt and bond markets may be reaching the end of their capacity to absorb it. Individual governments may not be able to make a significant difference.
The second is that the US shows no inclination to deal with its fiscal challenges in a serious way. As Irvine says, fiddling about in the bond market does little to change the fundamentals of US long-term debt — “bond markets are entirely rational, pushing up the risk premium”.
This is bad news for other countries trying to tackle their borrowing costs. In the UK, Chancellor John Healey can’t be sure that sticking to the fiscal rules in his October budget will make a difference to bond yields in the way that previous chancellors could. He can only hope that the UK looks less ugly than some of its peers.
Does this mean interest rates are definitely going higher?
Not necessarily. There are some who take a more optimistic view on inflation, at least in the short term. Dickie Hodges, manager of the Nomura Global Dynamic Bond fund, says:
“Although the risk of persistently elevated inflation cannot be dismissed, we continue to believe current market expectations for US monetary policy remain too hawkish. As long as the risk of meaningful second-round effects on inflation remains contained, we see little justification for Fed rate hikes this year.”
However, he admits that increasing public debt levels across most advanced economies warrants higher yields. “We continue to see more attractive opportunities in selected emerging market sovereign bonds, where yields remain compelling and fiscal positions are, in many cases, considerably stronger.”
So why should stock market investors care?
This is where bonds become important for anyone invested in shares. Higher bond yields ultimately mean money becomes more expensive.
A company wanting to borrow to build a factory, buy equipment or invest in new technology may have to pay more interest. A household refinancing a mortgage may have less disposable income afterwards. A government spending more on interest payments has less room to spend elsewhere.
All of that can slow the economy and squeeze company profits.
There is also another problem for shares. If relatively low-risk government bonds suddenly offer investors attractive returns, shares have to work harder to justify the additional risk of owning them. That could be particularly important for the AI boom.
Technology companies are spending extraordinary amounts building data centres, buying chips and developing AI infrastructure. Some of that investment is being financed with debt. If borrowing becomes more expensive, companies may eventually have to rethink how much they are willing, or able, to spend.
To date, equity markets have remained relatively sanguine in the face of rising bond yields, but higher borrowing costs will ultimately start to weigh on company margins and spending plans. A resolution to the war in Iran or lower energy prices could ease some of the immediate inflation pressure. But the bigger problem – governments carrying large debts while investors demand increasingly attractive returns to finance them – will be much harder to solve.
For investors, that means the next threat to the stock market may not necessarily begin in the stock market at all. It could start with the rising cost of borrowing in the bond market.
This article is provided for information only. The views of the author and any people quoted are their own and do not constitute financial advice. The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any fund or trust, or to adopt a particular investment strategy. However, the knowledge that professional analysts have analysed a fund or trust in depth before assigning them a rating can be a valuable additional filter for anyone looking to make their own decisions.
Past performance is not a reliable guide to future returns. Market and exchange-rate movements may cause the value of investments to go down as well as up. Yields will fluctuate and so income from investments is variable and not guaranteed. You may not get back the amount originally invested. Tax treatment depends of your individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future. If you are unsure about the suitability of any investment you should seek professional advice.
Whilst FundCalibre provides product information, guidance and fund research we cannot know which of these products or funds, if any, are suitable for your particular circumstances and must leave that judgement to you. Before you make any investment decision, make sure you’re comfortable and fully understand the risks. Further information can be found on Elite Rated funds by simply clicking on the name highlighted in the article.
Related insights
403. Higher yields, lower risks? Where bond investors should look now